27 2 / 2013
![dendroica:
brooklynmutt:
Pres. Obama unveils statue of Rosa Parks
(pic via msnbc)
At the same time as Justice Scalia was claiming that the Voting Rights Act is a “perpetuation of racial entitlement” across the street.
In today’s edition of “Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME, SCALIA???”:
The problem here, however, is suggested by the comment I made earlier, that the initial enactment of this legislation in a — in a time when the need for it was so much more abundantly clear was — in the Senate, there — it was double-digits against it. And that was only a 5-year term.
Then, it is reenacted 5 years later, again for a 5-year term. Double-digits against it in the Senate. Then it was reenacted for 7 years. Single digits against it. Then enacted for 25 years, 8 Senate votes against it. And this last enactment, not a single vote in the Senate against it. And the House is pretty much the same. Now, I don’t think that’s attributable to the fact that it is so much clearer now that we need this. I think it is attributable, very likely attributable, to a phenomenon that is called perpetuation of racial entitlement. It’s been written about. Whenever a society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes.
[via official transcript]
Lest any doubt remained about his motives…](http://25.media.tumblr.com/0050c4aa21ea50b5ea36cd5b9cc89e4d/tumblr_mivzymuzlR1qz80pso1_500.jpg)
Pres. Obama unveils statue of Rosa Parks
(pic via msnbc)
At the same time as Justice Scalia was claiming that the Voting Rights Act is a “perpetuation of racial entitlement” across the street.
In today’s edition of “Are you FUCKING KIDDING ME, SCALIA???”:
The problem here, however, is suggested by the comment I made earlier, that the initial enactment of this legislation in a — in a time when the need for it was so much more abundantly clear was — in the Senate, there — it was double-digits against it. And that was only a 5-year term.
Then, it is reenacted 5 years later, again for a 5-year term. Double-digits against it in the Senate. Then it was reenacted for 7 years. Single digits against it. Then enacted for 25 years, 8 Senate votes against it. And this last enactment, not a single vote in the Senate against it. And the House is pretty much the same. Now, I don’t think that’s attributable to the fact that it is so much clearer now that we need this. I think it is attributable, very likely attributable, to a phenomenon that is called perpetuation of racial entitlement. It’s been written about. Whenever a society adopts racial entitlements, it is very difficult to get out of them through the normal political processes.
[via official transcript]
Lest any doubt remained about his motives…
(via upworthy)
27 2 / 2013
partybarackisinthehousetonight:
if you’re ever feeling lazy just remember that the ancient greeks believed their gods lived on top of a very climbable hill but no one even bothered to check
(via laughinacorner)
27 2 / 2013
via laughingstation
The kitten’s attempt at defiance at the end!
(Source: reddit.com, via laughcentre)
